Steven Diaz v. Ken Clark

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Steven Diaz v. Ken Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 405 F. App'x 123
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 27, 2012·No. 08-15808·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN DIAZ,  No. 08-15808 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v.  2:05-CV-00376- DERRAL G ADAMS, MCE-CMK Respondent-Appellee.  ORDER

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed January 27, 2012

Before: Procter Hug, Jr. and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges, and James Dale Todd, Senior District Judge.*

ORDER

This case is now controlled by the Supreme Court’s deci- sion in Harrington v. Richter, 131 S. Ct. 770 (2011). In light of Harrington, we conclude that the state court’s decision was neither contrary to, nor involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

AFFIRMED.

*The Honorable James Dale Todd, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Western Tennessee, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steven Diaz v. Ken Clark, (9th Cir. 2012).

Steven Diaz v. Ken Clark (Steven Diaz v. Ken Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harrington v. Richter
131 S. Ct. 770 (Supreme Court, 2011)