Steven Diaz v. Ken Clark

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 27, 2012
Docket08-15808
StatusPublished

This text of Steven Diaz v. Ken Clark (Steven Diaz v. Ken Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steven Diaz v. Ken Clark, (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN DIAZ,  No. 08-15808 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v.  2:05-CV-00376- DERRAL G ADAMS, MCE-CMK Respondent-Appellee.  ORDER

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed January 27, 2012

Before: Procter Hug, Jr. and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges, and James Dale Todd, Senior District Judge.*

ORDER

This case is now controlled by the Supreme Court’s deci- sion in Harrington v. Richter, 131 S. Ct. 770 (2011). In light of Harrington, we conclude that the state court’s decision was neither contrary to, nor involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

AFFIRMED.

*The Honorable James Dale Todd, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Western Tennessee, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrington v. Richter
131 S. Ct. 770 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Steven Diaz v. Ken Clark, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steven-diaz-v-ken-clark-ca9-2012.