Steven Diaz v. Ken Clark
This text of Steven Diaz v. Ken Clark (Steven Diaz v. Ken Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEVEN DIAZ, No. 08-15808 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:05-CV-00376- DERRAL G ADAMS, MCE-CMK Respondent-Appellee. ORDER
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed January 27, 2012
Before: Procter Hug, Jr. and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges, and James Dale Todd, Senior District Judge.*
ORDER
This case is now controlled by the Supreme Court’s deci- sion in Harrington v. Richter, 131 S. Ct. 770 (2011). In light of Harrington, we conclude that the state court’s decision was neither contrary to, nor involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
AFFIRMED.
*The Honorable James Dale Todd, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Western Tennessee, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Steven Diaz v. Ken Clark, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steven-diaz-v-ken-clark-ca9-2012.