Steven Derek Phiffer v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 12, 2018
Docket11-17-00210-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Steven Derek Phiffer v. State (Steven Derek Phiffer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steven Derek Phiffer v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Opinion filed July 12, 2018

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-17-00210-CR __________

STEVEN DEREK PHIFFER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law Midland County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR154957

MEMORANDUM OPINION The jury convicted Appellant, Steven Derek Phiffer, of the Class A misdemeanor offense of possession of a prohibited weapon (knuckles) and assessed a $2,500 fine as punishment. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 46.05(a)(2), (e) (West Supp. 2017). We affirm. We previously abated this appeal for the trial court to determine whether Appellant desired to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether Appellant had made any arrangements for filing the brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). In compliance with this court’s order, the trial court held a hearing. Appellant did not appear at the hearing, but the record from that hearing shows that he had gone to the trial court clerk’s office and paid his fine and court costs in full. The trial court surmised that Appellant had “decided to not continue with his appeal.” Because Appellant is not indigent and because Appellant did not file a brief or make arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record, this appeal has been submitted on the clerk’s record—without a reporter’s record from the jury trial and without an appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c), 38.8(b)(4). We have reviewed the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record from the hearing that was conducted pursuant to Rule 38.8(b), and we have found no reversible error. Consequently, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

PER CURIAM

July 12, 2018 Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Willson, J., Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 46.05
Texas PE § 46.05(a)(2)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Steven Derek Phiffer v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steven-derek-phiffer-v-state-texapp-2018.