Steven D. Molasky v. Augustine Bustos

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Steven D. Molasky v. Augustine Bustos. Read the opinion of the Court — 492 F. App'x 801
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 5, 2012·No. 11-15060·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 05 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

In the Matter of: STEVEN D. MOLASKY, No. 11-15060

Debtor, D.C. No. 2:10-cv-00781-JCM-

PAL

District of Nevada,

STEVEN D. MOLASKY, Las Vegas

Appellant,

ORDER AMENDING

v. MEMORANDUM

AUGUSTINE C. BUSTOS, Appellee.

Before: NOONAN and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges, and TIMLIN, Senior District Judge.*

Bustos’ motion to correct is GRANTED.

The memorandum disposition filed September 13, 2012 is amended as follows: on page 2, paragraph 2, line 7, replace “4004(b)” with “4007”. In the same paragraph, lines 7-9, delete the sentence and citation “The deadline can be

*

The Honorable Robert J. Timlin, Senior District Judge for the U.S.

District Court for Central California, sitting by designation.

extended even after the deadline has already run. See FED. R. BANKR. P. 4004(b)(2).”

On page 4, last line, replace “4004(b)” with “4007”.

The dissent remains unchanged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steven D. Molasky v. Augustine Bustos, (9th Cir. 2012).

Steven D. Molasky v. Augustine Bustos (Steven D. Molasky v. Augustine Bustos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.