Steven D. L. Pinguet v. D. Swisher L. M. Saunders M. C. Millard B. Arnold R. Daniel Johnson

Fourth Circuit

Steven D. L. Pinguet v. D. Swisher L. M. Saunders M. C. Millard B. Arnold R. Daniel Johnson

37 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34877, 1994 WL 556923

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 12, 1994

Docket93-6886

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1495 (Steven D. L. Pinguet v. D. Swisher L. M. Saunders M. C. Millard B. Arnold R. Daniel Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steven D. L. Pinguet v. D. Swisher L. M. Saunders M. C. Millard B. Arnold R. Daniel Johnson, 37 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34877, 1994 WL 556923 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

37 F.3d 1495
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Steven D. L. PINGUET, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
D. SWISHER; L. M. Saunders; M. C. Millard; B. Arnold; R.
Daniel Johnson, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-6886.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 29, 1993.
Decided Oct. 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-93-588-R)

Steven D. L. Pinguet, appellant Pro Se.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pinguet v. Swisher, No. CA-93-588-R (W.D.Va. Aug. 9, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

We deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1495
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Steven D. L. PINGUET, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
D. SWISHER; L. M. Saunders; M. C. Millard; B. Arnold; R.
Daniel Johnson, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-6886.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 29, 1993.
Decided Oct. 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-93-588-R)

Steven D. L. Pinguet, appellant Pro Se.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pinguet v. Swisher, No. CA-93-588-R (W.D.Va. Aug. 9, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

We deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34877, 1994 WL 556923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steven-d-l-pinguet-v-d-swisher-l-m-saunders-m-c-mi-ca4-1994.