Steven Cullen Lewis v. State
Opinion
Opinion issued December 17, 2020
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00661-CR ——————————— STEVEN CULLEN LEWIS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 15 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2303611
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant is attempting to appeal from the trial court’s September 3, 2020
order denying his motion to suppress. The State has filed a motion to dismiss,
claiming that this Court lacks jurisdiction because appellant may only appeal from a
final judgment, and the order denying appellant’s motion to suppress is not a final judgment. This Court held the motion to give appellant the opportunity to respond,
but appellant has not responded. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(b).
Courts of appeals have no jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless
jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law. See Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d
792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The order denying appellant’s pretrial motion to
suppress is not a final judgment and may not be appealed until after final judgment
is rendered. See id.; Laney v. State, No. 14-00-01298-CR, 2001 WL 1098079, at *1
(Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 20, 2001, no pet.).
Accordingly, we grant the State’s motion and dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Hightower and Countiss. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steven Cullen Lewis v. State (Steven Cullen Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.