Steven Charles Williams v. Monique Epperson, Medical Supervisor
This text of 74 F.3d 1235 (Steven Charles Williams v. Monique Epperson, Medical Supervisor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
74 F.3d 1235
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Steven Charles WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Monique EPPERSON, Medical Supervisor, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-7248.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 14, 1995.
Decided: January 17, 1996.
Steven Charles Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Epperson, No. CA-95-42 (E.D.Va. Aug. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 F.3d 1235, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38808, 1996 WL 15442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steven-charles-williams-v-monique-epperson-medical-ca4-1996.