Steven Caldwell v. Michael J. Astrue

365 F. App'x 740
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 19, 2010
Docket08-3689
StatusUnpublished

This text of 365 F. App'x 740 (Steven Caldwell v. Michael J. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steven Caldwell v. Michael J. Astrue, 365 F. App'x 740 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Steven Caldwell appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Van Vickle v. Astrue, 539 F.3d 825, 828 & n. 2 (8th Cir.2008) (standard of review), we reject Caldwell’s arguments for reversal, see Willcockson v. Astrue, 540 F.3d 878, 880 (8th Cir.2008) (when determining residual functional capacity, administrative law judge must consider medical evidence, observations of treating doctors and others, and claimant’s own description of his limitations); Craig v. Apfel, 212 F.3d 433, 436 (8th Cir.2000) (administrative law judge is not required to discuss all evidence, and failure to cite specific evidence does not mean it was not considered). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Willcockson v. Astrue
540 F.3d 878 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
Van Vickle v. Astrue
539 F.3d 825 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
365 F. App'x 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steven-caldwell-v-michael-j-astrue-ca8-2010.