Steven Beebe v. Florida Department of Corrections
This text of Steven Beebe v. Florida Department of Corrections (Steven Beebe v. Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D19-2447 _____________________________
STEVEN BEEBE,
Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.
September 30, 2020
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Jackson v. Parkhouse, 826 So. 2d 478, 479 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (approving dismissal of mandamus petition because inmate did not meet his burden to “plead and prove that he had exhausted administrative remedies,” where his petition failed to demonstrate that he completed his administrative appeal); see also Fla. Admin. Code R. 33-103.007(2) (requiring inmate to attach formal grievance, response, and any documentation pertinent to review that he wants reviewed; and providing that an incomplete grievance appeal will be returned to the inmate without action).
RAY, C.J., and ROWE and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Steven Beebe, pro se, Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristen J. Lonergan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Steven Beebe v. Florida Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steven-beebe-v-florida-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2020.