Steven Barker v. Straw-K, Inc. D/B/A "A-Aarlington Abandoned Vehicle"

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 13, 2012
Docket13-12-00650-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Steven Barker v. Straw-K, Inc. D/B/A "A-Aarlington Abandoned Vehicle" (Steven Barker v. Straw-K, Inc. D/B/A "A-Aarlington Abandoned Vehicle") is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steven Barker v. Straw-K, Inc. D/B/A "A-Aarlington Abandoned Vehicle", (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00650-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

STEVEN BARKER, Appellant,

v.

STRAW-K, INC. D/B/A "A-AARLINGTON ABANDONED VEHICLE", Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 153rd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Steven Barker, perfected an appeal from a judgment rendered against

him in favor of appellee, Straw-K, Inc. d/b/a “A-AArlington Abandoned Vehicle.” On

November 7, 2012, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the

above cause was originally due on November 6, 2012, and that the deputy district clerk, Sandy Carter, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for

payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so

that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P.

37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten

days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of

prosecution.

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 13th day of December, 2012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Steven Barker v. Straw-K, Inc. D/B/A "A-Aarlington Abandoned Vehicle", Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steven-barker-v-straw-k-inc-dba-a-aarlington-aband-texapp-2012.