Steven Austin Gatlin v. State
This text of Steven Austin Gatlin v. State (Steven Austin Gatlin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
STEVEN AUSTIN GATLIN, § No. 08-12-00221-CV Appellants, § Appeal from the v. § 291st District Court § THE STATE OF TEXAS, of Dallas County, Texas § Appellee. (TC# F87-69764-U) §
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This case is before the Court on our own motion to determine whether it should be
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Because there is no appealable order, we will dismiss.
Appellant filed a pleading in the district court requesting that the court issue an order
prohibiting criminal justice agencies from disclosing Appellant’s criminal history record and
information relating to the offense that gave rise to Appellant’s deferred adjudication. The
district court determined that Appellant was not entitled to a non-disclosure order and denied the
petition.
The Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that there did not appear to be an appealable
order and/or judgment, and that the Court therefore intended to dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction unless any party could show grounds for continuing the appeal. The letter advised
that unless any party could show grounds for continuing the appeal within ten days from the date
of the letter that the matter would be submitted for dismissal. No party responded to the letter.
This Court has appellate jurisdiction over final judgments and certain interlocutory orders. Cantu Servs., Inc. v. United Freedom Assocs., Inc., 329 S.W.3d 58, 62 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2010,
no pet.). However, the Texas Government Code does not specifically provide this Court with
jurisdiction over an order denying a petition for non-disclosure. See generally TEX.GOV’T
CODE ANN. § 411.081 (West 2012); Guinn v. State, No. 05-90-01295-CV, 2010 WL 22817, *1
(Tex.App.--Dallas Jan. 6, 2010, no pet.)(mem. op.)(noting that Court of Appeals did not have
jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the denial of a petition for non-disclosure of criminal history
record information). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
August 15, 2012 CHRISTOPHER ANTCLIFF, Justice
Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Steven Austin Gatlin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steven-austin-gatlin-v-state-texapp-2012.