Steven Austin Gatlin v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 15, 2012
Docket08-12-00221-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Steven Austin Gatlin v. State (Steven Austin Gatlin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steven Austin Gatlin v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

STEVEN AUSTIN GATLIN, § No. 08-12-00221-CV Appellants, § Appeal from the v. § 291st District Court § THE STATE OF TEXAS, of Dallas County, Texas § Appellee. (TC# F87-69764-U) §

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This case is before the Court on our own motion to determine whether it should be

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Because there is no appealable order, we will dismiss.

Appellant filed a pleading in the district court requesting that the court issue an order

prohibiting criminal justice agencies from disclosing Appellant’s criminal history record and

information relating to the offense that gave rise to Appellant’s deferred adjudication. The

district court determined that Appellant was not entitled to a non-disclosure order and denied the

petition.

The Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that there did not appear to be an appealable

order and/or judgment, and that the Court therefore intended to dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction unless any party could show grounds for continuing the appeal. The letter advised

that unless any party could show grounds for continuing the appeal within ten days from the date

of the letter that the matter would be submitted for dismissal. No party responded to the letter.

This Court has appellate jurisdiction over final judgments and certain interlocutory orders. Cantu Servs., Inc. v. United Freedom Assocs., Inc., 329 S.W.3d 58, 62 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2010,

no pet.). However, the Texas Government Code does not specifically provide this Court with

jurisdiction over an order denying a petition for non-disclosure. See generally TEX.GOV’T

CODE ANN. § 411.081 (West 2012); Guinn v. State, No. 05-90-01295-CV, 2010 WL 22817, *1

(Tex.App.--Dallas Jan. 6, 2010, no pet.)(mem. op.)(noting that Court of Appeals did not have

jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the denial of a petition for non-disclosure of criminal history

record information). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

August 15, 2012 CHRISTOPHER ANTCLIFF, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cantu Services, Inc. v. United Freedom Associates, Inc.
329 S.W.3d 58 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Steven Austin Gatlin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steven-austin-gatlin-v-state-texapp-2012.