Steve Wooden v. Superintendent Joseph Terra, Philadelphia County District Attorney's Office
This text of Steve Wooden v. Superintendent Joseph Terra, Philadelphia County District Attorney's Office (Steve Wooden v. Superintendent Joseph Terra, Philadelphia County District Attorney's Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STEVE WOODEN, : Petitioner, : : Case No. 2:23-cv-1366 v. : : SUPERINTENDENT JOSEPH TERRA, : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT : ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, : Respondents. :
O R D E R AND NOW, this 3rd day of December, 2025, for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this date, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Petitioner’s Motion for Relief from Judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b), ECF No. 23, is DENIED and DISMISSED.1
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr._________ JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge
1 To the extent the motion could be construed as a successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2244, a certificate of appealability is denied because Wooden has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, nor would jurists of reason find the Court’s assessment debatable or wrong. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Steve Wooden v. Superintendent Joseph Terra, Philadelphia County District Attorney's Office, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steve-wooden-v-superintendent-joseph-terra-philadelphia-county-district-paed-2025.