Steve Wilson v. Charles M. Creecy Edward Jerry Earls Dennis Lucas William Carroll, Jr. Lesley Gutrell Billy Bass Kenneth Larnier

946 F.2d 889, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28820, 1991 WL 208923
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 18, 1991
Docket91-7193
StatusUnpublished

This text of 946 F.2d 889 (Steve Wilson v. Charles M. Creecy Edward Jerry Earls Dennis Lucas William Carroll, Jr. Lesley Gutrell Billy Bass Kenneth Larnier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steve Wilson v. Charles M. Creecy Edward Jerry Earls Dennis Lucas William Carroll, Jr. Lesley Gutrell Billy Bass Kenneth Larnier, 946 F.2d 889, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28820, 1991 WL 208923 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

946 F.2d 889

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Steve WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Charles M. CREECY; Edward Jerry Earls; Dennis Lucas;
William Carroll, Jr.; Lesley Gutrell; Billy
Bass; Kenneth Larnier, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7193.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 30, 1991.
Decided Oct. 18, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-432-CRT-F)

Steve Wilson, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Steve Wilson appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. Creecy, No. CA-91-432-CRT-F (E.D.N.C. Jul. 18, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
946 F.2d 889, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28820, 1991 WL 208923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steve-wilson-v-charles-m-creecy-edward-jerry-earls-dennis-lucas-william-ca4-1991.