Steve Van Horne v. Taylor County, Precinct 1, Place 2, Court

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 1, 2022
Docket11-22-00303-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Steve Van Horne v. Taylor County, Precinct 1, Place 2, Court (Steve Van Horne v. Taylor County, Precinct 1, Place 2, Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steve Van Horne v. Taylor County, Precinct 1, Place 2, Court, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Order filed December 1, 2022

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-22-00303-CV __________

STEVE VAN HORNE, Appellant V. TAYLOR COUNTY, PRECINCT 1, PLACE 2, COURT, et al., Appellees

On Appeal from the 350th District Court Taylor County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 12749-D

ORDER Appellant, Steve Van Horne, filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial court’s October 5, 2022 Order on Motion to Dismiss. After this appeal was docketed, we informed Appellant that it did not appear that the order from which Appellant attempted to appeal was a final, appealable order, and we requested that Appellant provide this court with a response showing grounds to continue this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Appellant filed a response in which he indicated that he did not understand why the trial court’s order would not be final. Unless specifically authorized by statute, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Tex. A & M Univ. Sys. v. Koseoglu, 233 S.W.3d 835, 840–41 (Tex. 2007); Lehmann v. Har–Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A judgment is final and appealable if it disposes of all parties and all claims in the case. Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195. The order that Appellant attempts to appeal does not state that it is a final or appealable order, nor does it dispose of all parties—specifically Appellant’s claims against defendant Tracy Kirtland. Accordingly, we have determined that an abatement is appropriate at this time to allow Appellant time to obtain a judgment that disposes of his claims against Kirtland. See TEX. R. APP. P. 27.2. We abate this appeal—pursuant to Rule 27.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure—to permit the parties to obtain a final, appealable order or judgment. If a final, appealable order or judgment has not been entered by February 14, 2023, we may dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. If a final judgment is entered before that date, the parties are ordered to notify this court immediately. The appeal is abated.

PER CURIAM December 1, 2022 Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Texas a & M University System v. Koseoglu
233 S.W.3d 835 (Texas Supreme Court, 2007)
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Steve Van Horne v. Taylor County, Precinct 1, Place 2, Court, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steve-van-horne-v-taylor-county-precinct-1-place-2-court-texapp-2022.