Steve Schwerin v. Nueces County Juvenile Board, Nueces County, Texas and Michael L. Lindsey D/B/A Nestor Consultants, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 31, 2012
Docket13-10-00451-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Steve Schwerin v. Nueces County Juvenile Board, Nueces County, Texas and Michael L. Lindsey D/B/A Nestor Consultants, Inc. (Steve Schwerin v. Nueces County Juvenile Board, Nueces County, Texas and Michael L. Lindsey D/B/A Nestor Consultants, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steve Schwerin v. Nueces County Juvenile Board, Nueces County, Texas and Michael L. Lindsey D/B/A Nestor Consultants, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00269-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF L. A. W., A CHILD ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 329th District Court of Wharton County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, M.W.1, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 329th

District Court of Wharton County, Texas, in cause number 45,492. Appellant has filed a

motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the appellant no longer wishes to pursue the

appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

1 In appeals from cases involving the termination of parental rights, the rules of appellate procedure require the use of an alias to refer to a minor, Aand if necessary to protect the minor’s identity, to the minor’s parent or other family member.” Tex. R. App. P. 9.8. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 31st day of May, 2012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Steve Schwerin v. Nueces County Juvenile Board, Nueces County, Texas and Michael L. Lindsey D/B/A Nestor Consultants, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steve-schwerin-v-nueces-county-juvenile-board-nueces-county-texas-and-texapp-2012.