Steve Reese v. State
This text of Steve Reese v. State (Steve Reese v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ January 18, 2017
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A17A0823. STEVE REESE v. THE STATE.
A jury found Steve Reese guilty of enticing a child for indecent purposes and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Years later, Reese filed an extraordinary motion for new trial, which the trial court denied. Reese then filed this direct appeal. An order denying an extraordinary motion for a new trial must be appealed by application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7); Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App. 327, 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 01/18/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Steve Reese v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steve-reese-v-state-gactapp-2017.