Steve O'Neal Green v. the State of Texas
This text of Steve O'Neal Green v. the State of Texas (Steve O'Neal Green v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals Tenth Appellate District of Texas
10-25-00030-CR
Steve O'Neal Green, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
On appeal from the 272nd District Court of Brazos County, Texas Judge John L. Brick, presiding Trial Court Cause No. 23-04189-CRF-272
JUSTICE SMITH delivered the opinion of the Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Steve Green, filed an appeal appearing to complain of the
denial of his right to a speedy trial. We informed Green that it did not appear
that there was an appealable order and gave him 14 days to respond to show
that this Court has jurisdiction over his complaints. Green did not respond,
and we find nothing in his notice of appeal that gives us jurisdiction over this
proceeding. Green has not yet been convicted in his case; thus, this appeal is
interlocutory. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a) (notice of appeal due within specified
time period after sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or after trial
court enters appealable order).
A court has jurisdiction over criminal appeals only when expressly
granted by law. See Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696-97 (Tex. Crim. App.
2008) (standard for determining jurisdiction is not whether appeal is precluded
by law, but whether appeal is authorized by law). We have no jurisdiction of
an interlocutory appeal of the denial of a motion for speedy trial. See Ex parte
Delbert, 582 S.W.2d 145, 146 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1979) (citing
Ordunez v. Bean, 579 S.W.2d 911 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979)); see United States v.
MacDonald, 435 U.S. 850, 862, 98 S. Ct. 1547, 56 L. Ed. 2d 18 (1978) ("Allowing
an exception to the rule against pretrial appeals in criminal cases for speedy
trial claims would threaten precisely the values manifested in the Speedy Trial
Clause.").
Therefore, we have no jurisdiction of this appeal and it is dismissed.
STEVE SMITH Justice
Green v. State Page 2 OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: February 27, 2025 Before Chief Justice Johnson, Justice Smith, and Justice Harris Dismissed Do not publish OT06
Green v. State Page 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Steve O'Neal Green v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steve-oneal-green-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.