Steve Nicandros, Luis Giusti, Tyler Nelson and Frontera Resources Corporation v. Zaza Mamulaishvila, Individuall and Derivatively on Behalf of Frontera Resources Corporation

Opinion

Opinion issued May 17, 2022.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

of the trial court’s order denying their motion to compel arbitration.1 In their

motion, Appellants state that on March 4, 2022, the trial court issued a final

judgment in the underlying case rendering their interlocutory appeal moot. See

Hernandez v. Ebrom, 289 S.W.3d 316, 319 (Tex. 2009) (“Appeals of some

interlocutory orders become moot because the orders have been rendered moot by

subsequent orders.”). No opinion has issued in this interlocutory appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(c).

We grant Appellants’ motion and dismiss this interlocutory appeal, with

costs taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1),

43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Landau, Hightower, and Rivas-Molloy.

1 See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 51.016.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-21-00125-CV ——————————— STEVE NICANDROS, LUIS GIUSTI, TYLER NELSON, AND FRONTERA RESOURCES CORPORATION, Appellants V. ZAZA MAMULAISHVILA, INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF FRONTERA RESOURCES CORPORATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 281st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2021-03816 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants Steve Nicandros, Luis Giusti, Tyler Nelson, and Frontera Resources Corporation filed a voluntary motion to dismiss their accelerated appeal