Steve Nicandros, Luis Giusti, Tyler Nelson and Frontera Resources Corporation v. Zaza Mamulaishvila, Individuall and Derivatively on Behalf of Frontera Resources Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas

Steve Nicandros, Luis Giusti, Tyler Nelson and Frontera Resources Corporation v. Zaza Mamulaishvila, Individuall and Derivatively on Behalf of Frontera Resources Corporation

DecidedDecember 7, 2021

Docket01-21-00125-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Steve Nicandros, Luis Giusti, Tyler Nelson and Frontera Resources Corporation v. Zaza Mamulaishvila, Individuall and Derivatively on Behalf of Frontera Resources Corporation (Steve Nicandros, Luis Giusti, Tyler Nelson and Frontera Resources Corporation v. Zaza Mamulaishvila, Individuall and Derivatively on Behalf of Frontera Resources Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steve Nicandros, Luis Giusti, Tyler Nelson and Frontera Resources Corporation v. Zaza Mamulaishvila, Individuall and Derivatively on Behalf of Frontera Resources Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Steve Nicandros, Luis Giusti, Tyler Nelson and Frontera Resources Corporation v. Zaza Mamulaishvili, individually and derivatively on behalf of Frontera Resources Corporation

Appellate case number: 01-21-00125-CV

Trial court case number: 2021-03816

Trial court: 281st District Court of Harris County

This is an appeal of an order denying a motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings. Counsel for Appellee Zaza Mamulaishvili filed a motion to withdraw, stating they “ha[ve] been unable to communicate with Mr. Mamulaishvili in a manner consistent with good attorney-client relations.” They further state Appellee “has not met his financial obligations under the terms of his engagement letter” and that counsel advised Appellee they would seek to withdraw if Appellee did not “provide [counsel] with the financial resources necessary to continue [Appellee’s] representation.” Counsel’s motion complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5 in that they state there are no current deadlines or settings and that they have advised Appellee by email and first class and certified mail to Appellee’s last known address of the motion and of Appellee’s right to object. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(a). Although we held this motion for more than ten days, Appellee did not respond. We grant the motion to withdraw. Counsel must immediately notify Appellee in writing of any deadlines in this appeal that have not been previously disclosed to Appellee and file a copy of this notice with the clerk of this Court within ten days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(c). It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy Acting individually

Date: December 7, 2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Steve Nicandros, Luis Giusti, Tyler Nelson and Frontera Resources Corporation v. Zaza Mamulaishvili, individually and derivatively on behalf of Frontera Resources Corporation

Appellate case number: 01-21-00125-CV

Trial court case number: 2021-03816

Trial court: 281st District Court of Harris County

This is an appeal of an order denying a motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings. Counsel for Appellee Zaza Mamulaishvili filed a motion to withdraw, stating they “ha[ve] been unable to communicate with Mr. Mamulaishvili in a manner consistent with good attorney-client relations.” They further state Appellee “has not met his financial obligations under the terms of his engagement letter” and that counsel advised Appellee they would seek to withdraw if Appellee did not “provide [counsel] with the financial resources necessary to continue [Appellee’s] representation.” Counsel’s motion complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5 in that they state there are no current deadlines or settings and that they have advised Appellee by email and first class and certified mail to Appellee’s last known address of the motion and of Appellee’s right to object. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(a). Although we held this motion for more than ten days, Appellee did not respond. We grant the motion to withdraw. Counsel must immediately notify Appellee in writing of any deadlines in this appeal that have not been previously disclosed to Appellee and file a copy of this notice with the clerk of this Court within ten days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(c). It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy Acting individually

Date: December 7, 2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Steve Nicandros, Luis Giusti, Tyler Nelson and Frontera Resources Corporation v. Zaza Mamulaishvila, Individuall and Derivatively on Behalf of Frontera Resources Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steve-nicandros-luis-giusti-tyler-nelson-and-frontera-resources-texapp-2021.