Steve Nesbitt v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Steve Nesbitt v. United States

249 F.2d 17

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 21, 1957·No. 13188·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was charged in an information with violations of the narcotic laws. He appeals from an order of the district court permitting dismissal of the information prior to trial upon motion of the government. In the circumstances disclosed by the record, we find that the action of the district court was an entirely proper exercise of the discretion implicitly delegated by Rule 48 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. Cf. United States v. Doe, D.C.D.Conn.1951, 101 F.Supp. 609.

The order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was charged in an information with violations of the narcotic laws. He appeals from an order of the district court permitting dismissal of the information prior to trial upon motion of the government. In the circumstances disclosed by the record, we find that the action of the district court was an entirely proper exercise of the discretion implicitly delegated by Rule 48 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. Cf. United States v. Doe, D.C.D.Conn.1951, 101 F.Supp. 609.

The order is affirmed.

Steve Nesbitt v. United States, 249 F.2d 17 (6th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

249 F.2d 17 (Steve Nesbitt v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related