Steve N. Hudson v. Ron Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Steve N. Hudson v. Ron Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23411, 1995 WL 370418

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 22, 1995

Docket95-6208

StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 166 (Steve N. Hudson v. Ron Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steve N. Hudson v. Ron Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, 59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23411, 1995 WL 370418 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

59 F.3d 166
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Steve N. HUDSON, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Ron ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent--Appellee.

No. 95-6208.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 22, 1995.

Steve N. Hudson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hudson v. Angelone, No. CA-94-466 (E.D. Va. Dec. 27, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

59 F.3d 166
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Steve N. HUDSON, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Ron ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent--Appellee.

No. 95-6208.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 22, 1995.

Steve N. Hudson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hudson v. Angelone, No. CA-94-466 (E.D. Va. Dec. 27, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23411, 1995 WL 370418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steve-n-hudson-v-ron-angelone-director-of-the-virg-ca4-1995.