Steve Ladell Runnels v. State
Opinion
|
|
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-10-407-CR
STEVE LADELL RUNNELS APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
We have considered appellant=s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.@ The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: October 28, 2010
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steve Ladell Runnels v. State (Steve Ladell Runnels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.