Steve Ladell Runnels v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 28, 2010·No. 02-10-00407-CR·Published

Opinion

                        COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

                                         NO. 2-10-407-CR

STEVE LADELL RUNNELS                                                                 APPELLANT

                                                             V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                             STATE

                                                        ----------

              FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant=s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.@  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).                                                                                                                                                                                         PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 28, 2010



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steve Ladell Runnels v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Steve Ladell Runnels v. State (Steve Ladell Runnels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.