Steve Klein v. City of Laguna Beach

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Steve Klein v. City of Laguna Beach. Read the opinion of the Court — 810 F.3d 693
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2018·No. 16-56309·Unpublished

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 27 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVE KLEIN; et al., No. 16-56309

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 8:08-cv-01369-JLS-MLG v.

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH and DOES, 1 ORDER* through 10,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 6, 2018** Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER and OWENS, Circuit Judges***.

Appellant’s motion to dismiss the petition for review, Dkt # 38, is

GRANTED. Accordingly, the memorandum disposition, Klein v. City of Laguna

Beach, 710 F. App’x 766 (9th Cir. 2018) (unpublished), is VACATED.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** Judge Reinhardt was on the original panel. The motion for voluntary dismissal was voted upon only by Judges Fletcher and Owens. The filing of this order shall serve as the court’s mandate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steve Klein v. City of Laguna Beach, (9th Cir. 2018).

Steve Klein v. City of Laguna Beach (Steve Klein v. City of Laguna Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steve Klein v. City of Laguna Beach
710 F. App'x 766 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)