Steuerman v. Feinman
This text of 19 A.D.2d 847 (Steuerman v. Feinman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 15, 1963, which granted plaintiff’s motion to open his default in failing to serve a complaint within the time prescribed (former Civ. Prae. Act, § 257) and extended such time. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. In our opinion, the explanation of plaintiff’s counsel that his file of the case had been misplaced, is insufficient to excuse the unreasonable delay of nearly two years in serving the complaint (cf. Gallagher v. City of New York, 19 A D 2d 623). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 A.D.2d 847, 244 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steuerman-v-feinman-nyappdiv-1963.