Steubing v. Hennessy

269 F. 719, 50 App. D.C. 203, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2342
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 3, 1921
DocketNo. 1354
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 F. 719 (Steubing v. Hennessy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steubing v. Hennessy, 269 F. 719, 50 App. D.C. 203, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2342 (D.C. Cir. 1921).

Opinion

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

Steubing appeals from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents finding that I-Iennessy is entitled to priority with respect to an invention relating to lifting trucks of a certain type. There are 16 claims involved. The decision of the three tribunals of the Patent Office are concurrent. We cannot say that they are manifestly wrong, and hence, following a well-established rule of decision in this court (In re Barratt, 11 App. D. C. 177; Creveling v. Jepson, 47 App. D. C. 597; Reid et al. v. Kitselman [D. C.] 266 Fed. 255; and Lindmark v. Hodgkinson, 31 App. D. C. 612), we affirm the Commissioner’s decision.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pengilly v. Copeland
40 F.2d 995 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 F. 719, 50 App. D.C. 203, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steubing-v-hennessy-cadc-1921.