Steubing v. Hennessy

269 F. 719, 50 App. D.C. 203, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2342
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 3, 1921·No. No. 1354·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

Steubing appeals from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents finding that I-Iennessy is entitled to priority with respect to an invention relating to lifting trucks of a certain type. There are 16 claims involved. The decision of the three tribunals of the Patent Office are concurrent. We cannot say that they are manifestly wrong, and hence, following a well-established rule of decision in this court (In re Barratt, 11 App. D. C. 177; Creveling v. Jepson, 47 App. D. C. 597; Reid et al. v. Kitselman [D. C.] 266 Fed. 255; and Lindmark v. Hodgkinson, 31 App. D. C. 612), we affirm the Commissioner’s decision.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steubing v. Hennessy, 269 F. 719, 50 App. D.C. 203, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2342 (D.C. Cir. 1921).

269 F. 719 (Steubing v. Hennessy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pengilly v. Copeland
40 F.2d 995 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1930)