Stetson v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stetson v. Smith

272 A.D.2d 1062

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 3, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1062 (Stetson v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stetson v. Smith, 272 A.D.2d 1062 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to determine adverse claims to the proceeds of life insurance policies. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and appellant James T. Smith made a cross motion for summary judgment in his answering affidavits. The Special Term denied both motions. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. The conflicting contentions of the parties should be resolved on a trial. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur; Nolan, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to determine adverse claims to the proceeds of life insurance policies. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and appellant James T. Smith made a cross motion for summary judgment in his answering affidavits. The Special Term denied both motions. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. The conflicting contentions of the parties should be resolved on a trial. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur; Nolan, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 1062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stetson-v-smith-nyappdiv-1947.