Stetson v. Sheehan

California Supreme Court

Stetson v. Sheehan

200 P. 392, 186 Cal. 334, 1921 Cal. LEXIS 449

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJune 23, 1921

DocketS. F. No. 9534.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 200 P. 392 (Stetson v. Sheehan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stetson v. Sheehan, 200 P. 392, 186 Cal. 334, 1921 Cal. LEXIS 449 (Cal. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

A petition for hearing in this court after decision by the district court of appeal of the first appellate district, division one, was filed herein on June 4, 1921, on the theory that the judgment of the district court of appeal was given on April 26, 1921. [1] The judgment of April 26, 1921, of the district court of appeal was, however, modified by that court on May 26, 1921, with the result that the judgment of the district court of appeal in the matter, as finally given, was given on May 26, 1921, and does not be *335 come final in that court until thirty days thereafter, viz., on June 25, 1921, and the jurisdiction of this court to grant a petition for hearing herein continues for thirty days thereafter, viz., to and including July 25, 1921.

A different situation would he presented if the modification hy the district court of appeal had been solely with regard to its opinion. Such a modification would not have affected the judgment, which would in that event have become final in that court on May 26, 1921, with the power in this court to grant a hearing within thirty days thereafter. (See National Bank of California v. Los Angeles etc. Co., 2 Cal. App. 659, 663, [84 Pac. 466, 468].)

The petition for a hearing filed herein June 4, 1921, will be considered as duly filed herein, and will be acted upon prior to the expiration of the time within which it may be considered by this court, viz., on or before July 25, 1921.

All the Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

A petition for hearing in this court after decision by the district court of appeal of the first appellate district, division one, was filed herein on June 4, 1921, on the theory that the judgment of the district court of appeal was given on April 26, 1921. [1] The judgment of April 26, 1921, of the district court of appeal was, however, modified by that court on May 26, 1921, with the result that the judgment of the district court of appeal in the matter, as finally given, was given on May 26, 1921, and does not be *335 come final in that court until thirty days thereafter, viz., on June 25, 1921, and the jurisdiction of this court to grant a petition for hearing herein continues for thirty days thereafter, viz., to and including July 25, 1921.

A different situation would he presented if the modification hy the district court of appeal had been solely with regard to its opinion. Such a modification would not have affected the judgment, which would in that event have become final in that court on May 26, 1921, with the power in this court to grant a hearing within thirty days thereafter. (See National Bank of California v. Los Angeles etc. Co., 2 Cal. App. 659, 663, [84 Pac. 466, 468].)

The petition for a hearing filed herein June 4, 1921, will be considered as duly filed herein, and will be acted upon prior to the expiration of the time within which it may be considered by this court, viz., on or before July 25, 1921.

All the Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 P. 392, 186 Cal. 334, 1921 Cal. LEXIS 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stetson-v-sheehan-cal-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack