Stetson Roane v. Halcy Martin Dean
This text of Stetson Roane v. Halcy Martin Dean (Stetson Roane v. Halcy Martin Dean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 30, 2020
NO. 03-19-00352-CV
Stetson Roane, Appellant
v.
Halcy Martin Dean, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KELLY, AND SMITH REVERSED AND RENDERED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN; DISSENTING OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY
This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on May 3, 2019. Having
reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in
the court’s interlocutory order. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s interlocutory order
denying Stetson Roane’s plea to the jurisdiction and renders judgment granting his plea and
dismissing Halcy Martin Dean’s claim. The appellee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal,
both in this Court and in the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stetson Roane v. Halcy Martin Dean, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stetson-roane-v-halcy-martin-dean-texapp-2020.