Stetson Glove Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Stetson Glove Co. v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 337, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1709

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stetson Glove Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Cust. Ct. 105 →

United States Customs Court·Decided June 9, 1949·No. No. 53247; protests 851337-G, etc. (St. Louis)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

At the trial plaintiff’s witness testified that he was familiar with the merchandise involved herein and also with exhibit 1 in United States v. Julius Kayser & Co. (33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). A list of items received in evidence as exhibit 1 showed that the merchandise in this proceeding consisted of gloves similar in all material respects to exhibit 1 in the cited case. [338]*338It appeared, however, that ease No. 8068, listed as being included in entry No. 659, protest 889482-G, was not one of the cases contained in said entry. Upon the record presented and on the authority of United States v. Julius Kayser & Co., supra, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to the items indicated by protest number, entry number, and case number on the schedule “A” attached to the decision, except as to case No. 8068, described above. The protests were overruled in all other respects.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Rao, J.

At the trial plaintiff’s witness testified that he was familiar with the merchandise involved herein and also with exhibit 1 in United States v. Julius Kayser & Co. (33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). A list of items received in evidence as exhibit 1 showed that the merchandise in this proceeding consisted of gloves similar in all material respects to exhibit 1 in the cited case. [338]*338It appeared, however, that ease No. 8068, listed as being included in entry No. 659, protest 889482-G, was not one of the cases contained in said entry. Upon the record presented and on the authority of United States v. Julius Kayser & Co., supra, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to the items indicated by protest number, entry number, and case number on the schedule “A” attached to the decision, except as to case No. 8068, described above. The protests were overruled in all other respects.

Stetson Glove Co. v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 337, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1709 (cusc 1949).

Pincite

22 Cust. Ct. 337 (Stetson Glove Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.