Sterritt v. Lockhart
This text of 30 Ky. 554 (Sterritt v. Lockhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the Opinion of the Court?
As the only two members of the court, who can adjudicate in this case, do not concur in opinion, (one being for a reversal and the other for an affirmance of the judgment below,) and as the legal effect of granting a re-hearing was a revocation of the former opinion (see Lipscomb vs. Grubs, III Bibb, 392,) therefore the necessary consequence must be, that the former opinion cannot be the judgment of this court, hut remains revoked, and the judgment of the circuit court stands affirmed, in consequence of the equal division of this court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 Ky. 554, 7 J.J. Marsh. 554, 1832 Ky. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sterritt-v-lockhart-kyctapp-1832.