Stero Holding Corp. v. Eichel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stero Holding Corp. v. Eichel

18 A.D.2d 995, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4111

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 995 (Stero Holding Corp. v. Eichel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stero Holding Corp. v. Eichel, 18 A.D.2d 995, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4111 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on June 27, 1962, denying defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs. In view of the unusual circumstances of this case we feel that the interests of justice require that a trial be had. Accordingly and without passing upon the question of whether there is a triable issue as to actionable negligence, in the exercise of discretion, we affirm. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on June 27, 1962, denying defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs. In view of the unusual circumstances of this case we feel that the interests of justice require that a trial be had. Accordingly and without passing upon the question of whether there is a triable issue as to actionable negligence, in the exercise of discretion, we affirm. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 995, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stero-holding-corp-v-eichel-nyappdiv-1963.