Sternkopf v. Hillers

247 A.D. 738

This text of 247 A.D. 738 (Sternkopf v. Hillers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sternkopf v. Hillers, 247 A.D. 738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Order denying the motion of defendants Hillers to vacate the judgment entered herein and to remit the case to the justice before whom it was tried, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The defendants’ adequate remedy lies in an appeal to this court from the judgment, for in' this case a decision was signed by the trial justice, upon which decision judgment was duly entered. This is not a case where judgment was entered without a decision as in Wise v. Cohen, No. 1 (113 App. Div. 859). Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wise v. Cohen
113 A.D. 859 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D. 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sternkopf-v-hillers-nyappdiv-1936.