Sterne v. Spalding

1 Kirby 177
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided November 15, 1786·Published

Opinion

As to the facts proved — there appears to have been uncertainty, both in regard to the right of the property, and the quantity left behind: — ■ The creditor, then, is certainly excusable for not levying his execution, and might well elect his more sure remedy against the body of the debtor, or other property, which could not be reached by that execution.

Judgment was for the- plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sterne v. Spalding, 1 Kirby 177 (Colo. Ct. App. 1786).

1 Kirby 177 (Sterne v. Spalding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.