Sternberger v. Sussman

98 A. 1087, 85 N.J. Eq. 593, 15 Buchanan 593, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 423
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 6, 1916·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirmance—The Ciiiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenci-iaru, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor—13. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sternberger v. Sussman, 98 A. 1087, 85 N.J. Eq. 593, 15 Buchanan 593, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 423 (N.J. 1916).

98 A. 1087 (Sternberger v. Sussman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Lentini
169 A.2d 208 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.
99 A.2d 829 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)