Sternberg v. Walsh

273 A.D. 972, 78 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5541
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 12, 1948·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order denying appellants’ motion to amend the answer so as to set forth defenses based on section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, reversed, without costs, and the motion granted, without costs. Under all the relevant facts and circumstances there is no prejudice in law to the plaintiff by amendment of the answer so as to set forth facts which were in existence at the time of the service of the original answer, and which facts have no different legal consequences by reason of the delay. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sternberg v. Walsh, 273 A.D. 972, 78 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

273 A.D. 972 (Sternberg v. Walsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kane v. Long Island Jewish Hospital
29 A.D.2d 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
Hirsch v. Flick
17 A.D.2d 961 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Bonsignore v. L & D Carriers, Inc.
24 Misc. 2d 500 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)