Sternberg v. Walsh
This text of 273 A.D. 972 (Sternberg v. Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order denying appellants’ motion to amend the answer so as to set forth defenses based on section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, reversed, without costs, and the motion granted, without costs. Under all the relevant facts and circumstances there is no prejudice in law to the plaintiff by amendment of the answer so as to set forth facts which were in existence at the time of the service of the original answer, and which facts have no different legal consequences by reason of the delay. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.D. 972, 78 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sternberg-v-walsh-nyappdiv-1948.