Stern v. Zapf

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Stern v. Zapf

207 N.W. 740, 166 Minn. 503, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1236

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided March 12, 1926·No. No. 25,093.·Published

Opinion

WILSON, C. J.

This is an action to recover upon a contract similar to the one in Stern v. Mayer, supra, page 346, except that the amount is to be paid “in monthly payments of $6.15 each, or more at my option, each month hereafter beginning with the month of October 1, 1917.” Upon the trial a verdict was directed for defendant. Plaintiff appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

Upon authority of Stern v. Mayer, supra, the order of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WILSON, C. J.

This is an action to recover upon a contract similar to the one in Stern v. Mayer, supra, page 346, except that the amount is to be paid “in monthly payments of $6.15 each, or more at my option, each month hereafter beginning with the month of October 1, 1917.” Upon the trial a verdict was directed for defendant. Plaintiff appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

Upon authority of Stern v. Mayer, supra, the order of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Stern v. Zapf, 207 N.W. 740, 166 Minn. 503, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1236 (Mich. 1926).

Pincite

207 N.W. 740 (Stern v. Zapf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.