Stern v. Zapf

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Stern v. Zapf

207 N.W. 740, 166 Minn. 503, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1236

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMarch 12, 1926

DocketNo. 25,093.

StatusPublished

This text of 207 N.W. 740 (Stern v. Zapf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stern v. Zapf, 207 N.W. 740, 166 Minn. 503, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1236 (Mich. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

WILSON, C. J.

This is an action to recover upon a contract similar to the one in Stern v. Mayer, supra, page 346, except that the amount is to be paid “in monthly payments of $6.15 each, or more at my option, each month hereafter beginning with the month of October 1, 1917.” Upon the trial a verdict was directed for defendant. Plaintiff appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

Upon authority of Stern v. Mayer, supra, the order of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WILSON, C. J.

This is an action to recover upon a contract similar to the one in Stern v. Mayer, supra, page 346, except that the amount is to be paid “in monthly payments of $6.15 each, or more at my option, each month hereafter beginning with the month of October 1, 1917.” Upon the trial a verdict was directed for defendant. Plaintiff appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

Upon authority of Stern v. Mayer, supra, the order of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 N.W. 740, 166 Minn. 503, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stern-v-zapf-minn-1926.