Stern v. United States

77 F. 607, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2995
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided December 5, 1896·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

These importers appear to have got such a decision upon an appeal to the board of general appraisers that they did not apply to the circuit court for a review, but left it for transmission to the collector. Upon reliquidation this second appeal has been taken. If this appeal includes anything not covered by the former appeal, it is, as to that, altogether too late. If not, it was ended by the disposition made of that, which the statute makes absolutely conclusive. 26 Stat. 137, 138, § 14. The case of Robertson v. Downing, 127 U. S. 607, 8 Sup. Ct. 1328, relied upon for the importers, arose under a different statute, and involved no question as to a second appeal from a collector’s decision, but only, in this respect, to the time of taking the first. Decision of appraisers affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stern v. United States, 77 F. 607, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2995 (circtsdny 1896).

77 F. 607 (Stern v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Edward M. Poons Co. of Kobe
18 C.C.P.A. 283 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1930)