Stern v. Stern

42 N.W.2d 738, 327 Mich. 567, 1950 Mich. LEXIS 476
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 18, 1950·No. Docket 13, Calendar 44,716·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Boyles, C. J.

Plaintiff was granted a divorce August 14, 1945, custody of the 6-year-old minor child, and defendant was ordered to pay $50 per month for his support. In 1949, plaintiff filed a petition to increase said allowance and the circuit judge, after hearing, entered an order increasing it to $20 per week. Defendant appeals.

In addition to the allowance for the child, the decree of divorce required the defendant to pay to plaintiff $150 per month alimony while she remained unmarried. This was cut off by her remarriage shortly after the decree was entered. Her second marriage was terminated by divorce in 1947, since which time her earnings have not been sufficient to support herself and the minor. The expense of education and maintenance of the child has increased. At the time of the hearing she was unemployed and her only means for support of the child was the allowance received from the defendant.

The defendant resists the increase on the ground that his income is only about one third of what it was when the decree was entered. However, he admits receiving an average income of $350 per month, including $125 per month income from property he owns. He claims this is not sufficient for his own needs, which include $40 per month for “recreation & business entertainment.”

There was ample showing of a change of circumstances of the plaintiff, the needs of the child, and *569 the ability of the defendant to pay, to support the order increasing the allowance.

Affirmed, with costs to appellee.

Reid, North, Dethmers, Btjtzel, Carr, Bttshnell, and Sharpe, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stern v. Stern, 42 N.W.2d 738, 327 Mich. 567, 1950 Mich. LEXIS 476 (Mich. 1950).

42 N.W.2d 738 (Stern v. Stern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hempton v. Hempton
329 N.W.2d 514 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1982)
Hakken v. Hakken
298 N.W.2d 907 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1980)
Hagbloom v. Hagbloom
247 N.W.2d 373 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)
Stanaway v. Stanaway
245 N.W.2d 723 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)
Boyer v. Boyer
186 N.W.2d 842 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)
Ford v. Ford
46 N.W.2d 452 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1951)