Stern v. Stein

694 So. 2d 851, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6148, 1997 WL 292670
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 4, 1997
DocketNo. 96-1360
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 694 So. 2d 851 (Stern v. Stein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stern v. Stein, 694 So. 2d 851, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6148, 1997 WL 292670 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PARIENTE, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals an order striking his pleadings for discovery violations. We reverse the order striking the pleadings and vacate the subsequently-entered final judgment. The trial court abused its discretion in striking plaintiffs pleadings when the time provided for compliance with discovery, based on a prior court order of a predecessor judge, had not yet expired.

In reversing, we specifically reject plaintiffs argument that the trial court’s comments required its recusal.

DELL and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stern v. Stein
708 So. 2d 288 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
694 So. 2d 851, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6148, 1997 WL 292670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stern-v-stein-fladistctapp-1997.