Stern v. Sequal Technologies, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedNovember 9, 2012
Docket2012-1207
StatusUnpublished

This text of Stern v. Sequal Technologies, Inc. (Stern v. Sequal Technologies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stern v. Sequal Technologies, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MICHAEL STERN AND DIGIFLO, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

SEQUAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________

2012-1207 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 10-CV-1257, Judge James L. Robart. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

PHILIP P. MANN, Mann Law Group, of Seattle, Washington, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Of counsel on the brief was JOHN WHITAKER, Whitaker Law Group, of Seattle, Washington.

ANDREW D. SKALE, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo P.C., of San Diego, California, argued for defendant-appellee. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, MOORE, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 9, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stern v. Sequal Technologies, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stern-v-sequal-technologies-inc-cafc-2012.