Stern v. Peskin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stern v. Peskin

207 A.D.2d 309, 616 N.Y.S.2d 939

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 24, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.D.2d 309 (Stern v. Peskin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stern v. Peskin, 207 A.D.2d 309, 616 N.Y.S.2d 939 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.), entered on August 15, 1994, which denied the motion of petitioners-appellants Stern and Maloney to permit their offer of proof to allow the introduction of further evidence, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Special Term correctly precluded appellants from offering testimony and evidence in an attempt to show that the Liberal Party enrollment figures for the 14th Congressional District in the State of New York, issued by the Board of Elections in the City of New York, pursuant to section 5-604 of the Election Law of the State of New York, were not controlling. Concur—Wallach, J. P., Asch, Rubin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.), entered on August 15, 1994, which denied the motion of petitioners-appellants Stern and Maloney to permit their offer of proof to allow the introduction of further evidence, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Special Term correctly precluded appellants from offering testimony and evidence in an attempt to show that the Liberal Party enrollment figures for the 14th Congressional District in the State of New York, issued by the Board of Elections in the City of New York, pursuant to section 5-604 of the Election Law of the State of New York, were not controlling. Concur—Wallach, J. P., Asch, Rubin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 309, 616 N.Y.S.2d 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stern-v-peskin-nyappdiv-1994.