Stern v. Olsted

207 N.W. 650, 166 Minn. 504, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1237
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMarch 12, 1926
DocketNo. 25,111.
StatusPublished

This text of 207 N.W. 650 (Stern v. Olsted) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stern v. Olsted, 207 N.W. 650, 166 Minn. 504, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1237 (Mich. 1926).

Opinion

WILSON, C. J.

This is an action to recover upon a contract of the character involved in Stern v. Mayer, supra, page 346. A verdict was rendered for defendant and plaintiff appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial. We will not consider the questions presented in the briefs on this appeal, but we recognize that the insufficiency of a complaint, with certain exceptions not here applicable, may be raised at any time. Dun. Dig. §§ 7681 and 7732.

Upon authority of Stern v. Mayer, supra, the complaint in this action fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and for that reason the order of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 N.W. 650, 166 Minn. 504, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stern-v-olsted-minn-1926.