Stern v. Kaufman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stern v. Kaufman

282 A.D. 933, 125 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5479

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 933 (Stern v. Kaufman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stern v. Kaufman, 282 A.D. 933, 125 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5479 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Except as to plaintiff Benjamin Stern and defendant Papkin, judgment is unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, unless the several plaintiffs consent to a reduction of the verdict in their favor as follows: Howard Stern, from $3,500 to $2,000; Mollie Rock, from $10,000 to $4,000; Louis Rock, from $2,000 to $1,000; Rebecca Rothfarb, from $4,000 to $2,000; Isidore Rothfarb, from $1,250 to $1,000. In the event that any of these plain[934]*934tiffs fails to stipulate as to the reduction herein indicated, the nonassenting plaintiff may make appropriate application to sever as to his or her cause of action. As to the plaintiff Benjamin Stern and defendant Papkin, the judgment is affirmed. Order appealed from is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice. Present — Cohn, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ. [See post, p. 936.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Except as to plaintiff Benjamin Stern and defendant Papkin, judgment is unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, unless the several plaintiffs consent to a reduction of the verdict in their favor as follows: Howard Stern, from $3,500 to $2,000; Mollie Rock, from $10,000 to $4,000; Louis Rock, from $2,000 to $1,000; Rebecca Rothfarb, from $4,000 to $2,000; Isidore Rothfarb, from $1,250 to $1,000. In the event that any of these plain[934]*934tiffs fails to stipulate as to the reduction herein indicated, the nonassenting plaintiff may make appropriate application to sever as to his or her cause of action. As to the plaintiff Benjamin Stern and defendant Papkin, the judgment is affirmed. Order appealed from is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice. Present — Cohn, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ. [See post, p. 936.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 933, 125 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stern-v-kaufman-nyappdiv-1953.