Stern v. Kafin
676 So. 2d 458, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5487, 1996 WL 279578
Opinion
Affirmed. See Reilly v. Barrera, 620 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Breitbart v. Zaucha, 185 So.2d 496 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966) (penalty interest presumed to be limited to defaulted payments); cf. THFN Realty Co. v. Kirkman/Conroy Ltd., 546 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (where the language is clear and unambiguous, the mortgage provisions control the application of the default rate of interest).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stern v. Kafin, 676 So. 2d 458, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5487, 1996 WL 279578 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
676 So. 2d 458 (Stern v. Kafin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reilly v. Barrera
620 So. 2d 1116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Breitbart v. Zaucha
185 So. 2d 496 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
THFN Realty Co. v. Kirkman/Conroy Ltd.
546 So. 2d 1158 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)