Stern v. Kafin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stern v. Kafin

676 So. 2d 458, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5487, 1996 WL 279578

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 29, 1996

DocketNo. 95-2681

StatusPublished

This text of 676 So. 2d 458 (Stern v. Kafin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stern v. Kafin, 676 So. 2d 458, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5487, 1996 WL 279578 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Reilly v. Barrera, 620 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Breitbart v. Zaucha, 185 So.2d 496 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966) (penalty interest presumed to be limited to defaulted payments); cf. THFN Realty Co. v. Kirkman/Conroy Ltd., 546 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (where the language is clear and unambiguous, the mortgage provisions control the application of the default rate of interest).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Reilly v. Barrera, 620 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Breitbart v. Zaucha, 185 So.2d 496 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966) (penalty interest presumed to be limited to defaulted payments); cf. THFN Realty Co. v. Kirkman/Conroy Ltd., 546 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (where the language is clear and unambiguous, the mortgage provisions control the application of the default rate of interest).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

676 So. 2d 458, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5487, 1996 WL 279578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stern-v-kafin-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack