Stern v. Indemnity Insurance of North America

167 Misc. 446, 4 N.Y.S.2d 73, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1545
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedApril 8, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 167 Misc. 446 (Stern v. Indemnity Insurance of North America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stern v. Indemnity Insurance of North America, 167 Misc. 446, 4 N.Y.S.2d 73, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1545 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The assignment to plaintiff in payment of his fee is expressly sanctioned by section 275 of the Penal Law. To constitute the offense contemplated by section 274 of the Penal Law the primary purpose of the assignment must be to enable plaintiff to bring a suit, and this intent may not be merely incidental and contingent. (Moses v. McDivitt, 88 N. Y. 62.)

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff for the sum demanded in the complaint. Plaintiff’s appeal from order and defendant’s appeal from resettled judgment dismissed.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Fra nkenthaler and ShienTAG, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knobel v. Estate of Eugene A. Hoffman Inc.
105 Misc. 2d 333 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Sprung v. Jaffe
147 N.E.2d 6 (New York Court of Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 Misc. 446, 4 N.Y.S.2d 73, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stern-v-indemnity-insurance-of-north-america-nyappterm-1938.