Stern v. Indemnity Insurance of North America
Opinion
The assignment to plaintiff in payment of his fee is expressly sanctioned by section 275 of the Penal Law. To constitute the offense contemplated by section 274 of the Penal Law the primary purpose of the assignment must be to enable plaintiff to bring a suit, and this intent may not be merely incidental and contingent. (Moses v. McDivitt, 88 N. Y. 62.)
Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff for the sum demanded in the complaint. Plaintiff’s appeal from order and defendant’s appeal from resettled judgment dismissed.
All concur. Present — Lydon, Fra nkenthaler and ShienTAG, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
167 Misc. 446 (Stern v. Indemnity Insurance of North America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.