Stern v. Indemnity Insurance of North America

167 Misc. 446, 4 N.Y.S.2d 73, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1545
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 8, 1938·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The assignment to plaintiff in payment of his fee is expressly sanctioned by section 275 of the Penal Law. To constitute the offense contemplated by section 274 of the Penal Law the primary purpose of the assignment must be to enable plaintiff to bring a suit, and this intent may not be merely incidental and contingent. (Moses v. McDivitt, 88 N. Y. 62.)

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff for the sum demanded in the complaint. Plaintiff’s appeal from order and defendant’s appeal from resettled judgment dismissed.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Fra nkenthaler and ShienTAG, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stern v. Indemnity Insurance of North America, 167 Misc. 446, 4 N.Y.S.2d 73, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1545 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

167 Misc. 446 (Stern v. Indemnity Insurance of North America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knobel v. Estate of Eugene A. Hoffman Inc.
105 Misc. 2d 333 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Sprung v. Jaffe
147 N.E.2d 6 (New York Court of Appeals, 1957)