Stern v. City of New York

25 A.D.3d 323, 805 N.Y.S.2d 833

This text of 25 A.D.3d 323 (Stern v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stern v. City of New York, 25 A.D.3d 323, 805 N.Y.S.2d 833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Order Supreme Court, New York County (Paviola A. Soto, J.), entered April 28, 2004, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs opposition adduced evidence sufficient to raise an issue of fact as to whether the denial of a promotion for him by defendant City was due to a widespread discriminatory custom in violation of his civil rights (42 USC § 1983; see Davis v City of [324]*324New York, 75 Fed Appx 827, 829 [2d Cir 2003]). We note defendant did not submit a reply. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. City of New York
75 F. App'x 827 (Second Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 A.D.3d 323, 805 N.Y.S.2d 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stern-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2006.