Stern Furniture Co. v. Stern

Ohio Supreme Court

Stern Furniture Co. v. Stern

87 N.E.2d 351, 152 Ohio St. 191, 152 Ohio St. (N.S.) 191, 39 Ohio Op. 479, 1949 Ohio LEXIS 342

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 20, 1949

Docket31849

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 87 N.E.2d 351 (Stern Furniture Co. v. Stern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stern Furniture Co. v. Stern, 87 N.E.2d 351, 152 Ohio St. 191, 152 Ohio St. (N.S.) 191, 39 Ohio Op. 479, 1949 Ohio LEXIS 342 (Ohio 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

A proceeding in contempt, instituted in the Court of Appeals for the violation of its former order, is a case originating in the Court of Appeals within the meaning of Section 2, Article IV of the Constitution, and an appeal as of right may prop *193 erly be filed in this court. Cady v. Cleveland Worsted Mills Co., 126 Ohio St., 171, 184 N. E., 511.

The Court of Appeals found there had been specific violations of its decree in injunction. From an examination of the record we are of the opinion that the finding in contempt was warranted.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Turner and Taet, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI