Sterling v. Town of Hempstead

260 A.D.2d 628, 687 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4305
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 1999·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), dated June 11, 1998, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendants failed to establish their entitlement to judgment in their favor as a matter of law, and were not entitled to summary judgment based solely on claimed deficiencies in the plaintiffs proof (see, Porter v Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 224 AD2d 674). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sterling v. Town of Hempstead, 260 A.D.2d 628, 687 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4305 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

260 A.D.2d 628 (Sterling v. Town of Hempstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Silverman v. Sciartelli
2 A.D.3d 1463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Cincotta v. City of New York
292 A.D.2d 558 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Hicks v. City of Buffalo
281 A.D.2d 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Carrington v. Commissioner of Westchester County Correctional Facility
278 A.D.2d 352 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)