Sterling v. Stewart

225 A.D.2d 334, 638 N.Y.2d 911, 638 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2092

This text of 225 A.D.2d 334 (Sterling v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sterling v. Stewart, 225 A.D.2d 334, 638 N.Y.2d 911, 638 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2092 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

The IAS Court appropriately confirmed the recommendation and report of the Special Referee. Plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate that the amount of the counsel fees deemed appropriate by the Special Referee and confirmed by the court either violated professional standards or constituted an abuse of discretion (see, Matter of Freeman, 34 NY2d 1, 9-10).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Rubin, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.
311 N.E.2d 480 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 334, 638 N.Y.2d 911, 638 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sterling-v-stewart-nyappdiv-1996.