Sterling v. State
This text of 139 So. 832 (Sterling v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from a judgment of conviction of the offense of murder in the second degree. The indictment charged that the appellant unlawfully and with malice aforethought killed Ross Sneed by cutting him with a knife, but without premeditation or deliberation. The jury fixed his punishment at imprisonment for ten years, and the court duly sentenced him to the penitentiary for that period. This appeal is upon the record proper only. There is no bill of exceptions. In the absence of a bill of exceptions the motion for a new trial which appears in the record cannot be considered. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 So. 832, 24 Ala. App. 604, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sterling-v-state-alactapp-1932.