Sterling v. Rosen
This text of 275 F. App'x 222 (Sterling v. Rosen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Steven C. Sterling and Laura M. Sterling appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order lifting the automatic stay with respect to his residence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sterling v. Beskins, No. 3:07-cr-00039-nkm, 2007 WL 2915170 (W.D.Va. Oct. 4, 2007). We deny the Appellants’ motion for preparation of a transcript at government expense, and dis[223]*223pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 F. App'x 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sterling-v-rosen-ca4-2008.